Search This Blog

MyFreeCopyright.com Registered & Protected
Showing posts with label Jamaica Observer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jamaica Observer. Show all posts

Saturday, December 24, 2011

Jamaica's Reaction to Statement By Portia Simpson Miller XI

Mullings slams Simpson Miller over buggery law review plan


'No nation that seeks to move away from God's words can succeed'
BY MARK CUMMINGS Editor-at-Large Western Bureau cummingsm@jamaicaobserver.com


MONTEGO BAY, St James — Jamaica Labour Party (JLP) candidate for West Central St James Clive Mullings has blasted Opposition Leader Portia Simpsom Miller for promising to review the country's buggery law, should her party return to power.
Armed with a Bible, a stone-faced Mullings urged scores of Labourites at a mass meeting in Montego Bay's historic Sam Sharpe Square on Thursday night to unite against the repealing of such a law.
Jamaica Labour Party (JLP) candidate for West Central St James Clive Mullings greets party supporters at Thursday’s mass meeting in Sam Sharpe Square, Montego Bay. (Photo: Mark Cummings)
 1/1 
"We must understand that for a nation to be blessed, for a nation to grow, we cannot depart from God's words. No nation, no nation that seeks to move away from God's words can succeed," he declared.
Quoting scriptures, Mullings pointed the large gathering to Genesis Chapter 19: verse 24, citing the reason why "the Lord poured down sulphur and brimstone on Sodom and Gomorrah."
Simpson Miller, in responding to a question raised during the final political debate convened by the Jamaica Debates Commission on Tuesday night, said that should the PNP return to power, she would initiate a review of the buggery law.
She also said that her party would not prevent anyone from becoming a member of her Cabinet based on their sexual orientation.
Recently, several countries, including the United Kingdom and the United States, have suggested that they might withhold aid to countries that are not doing enough to protect the rights of homosexuals.
But Mullings, an attorney, urged the horn-blowing supporters on Thursday to take a stance, arguing that the United Kingdom's position is contrary to what we have learnt and know under the word of God.
"We are no longer a colony of Britain, so if that's the way they want to go, let them go, but let us not depart from God's word," he argued.
He told the jubilant supporters that next Thursday's general election should not be viewed only as it relates to the creation of jobs.
"We must understand carefully that the choices we make must not be only as it relates to employment, it should also be regarding the moral direction of your country and the future for your children," the JLP candidate argued.
"So Labourites, Jamaicans, when we go out to vote think seriously about the direction of your country. I implore you to understand that while we are here at this point before general election, don't misunderstand what we are facing. It is not just the economy, it is in regard to the future of the country for our children and you must now decide whether you want a nation that will be overtaken by those who have punitive lifestyles or whether you are serious about building our country."
Earlier this week during a mass meeting in Annotto Bay, St Mary, JLP candidate for West Portland Daryl Vaz also criticised the opposition leader for suggesting that a future PNP government will review the buggery law.
Several other speakers, including JLP deputy leader Desmond McKenzie, also blasted Simpson Miller for her stance on the buggery law during Thursday night's meeting.


Read more: http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/No-nation-that-seeks-to-move-away-from-God-s-words-can-succeed_10451336#ixzz1hUFfIJQd



Mullings Rips Into Gleaner For Supporting Portia


Bobby Montague (left), JLP deputy chairman, has the attention of Darly Vaz (centre) and Prime Minister Andrew Holness at a JLP meeting in St Mary on Wednesday night.
Bobby Montague (left), JLP deputy chairman, has the attention of Darly Vaz (centre) and Prime Minister Andrew Holness at a JLP meeting in St Mary on Wednesday night.
Janet Silvera, Senior Gleaner Writer
WESTERN BUREAU:The Jamaica Labour Party's (JLP) candidate for West Central St James, Clive Mullings, has blasted The Gleaner for its editorial which congratulated People's National Party (PNP) president Portia Simpson Miller for her announcement that a government led by her would lead a review of the buggery laws.
Addressing a JLP mass meeting in Sam Sharpe Square in Montego Bay on Thursday night, Mullings, with his Bible in hand, tore into The Gleaner.
"I want the editor of The Gleaner to listen to the word of God. For a nation to grow and prosper, it cannot depart from God's word," said Mullings, as he quoted several scriptures and argued that no nation which moves away from God's plan can succeed.
"God brought down fire and brimstone on Sodom and Gomorrah," added Mullings.
Criticising the United Kingdom, which he said has taken a position to do something contrary to the word of God, Mullings noted that Jamaica was no longer a colony of Britain.
"So if they (the British) want to go in that direction, let them go."
Grabbing the Bible tightly in his hand, Mullings stressed that it was critical for all Labourites and other Jamaicans to understand carefully the choices they are making regarding the moral direction of the country, and the future of their children.
The issue of the Buggery Act came up on Tuesday evening during the leadership debate, when Simpson Miller responded to a question on the subject.
She said then that it was time that the act be "reviewed" and all members of the House of Representatives provided with an opportunity to vote on the matter based on their conscience.
Janet.silvera@gleanerjm.com

Friday, December 23, 2011

Church angry, gays happy Comments [Pictures]











Jamaica's Reaction to Statement By Portia Simpson Miller Part VIII

I think I missed the memo that Jamaica had become a theocracy. The following was taken from the Jamaica Observer. 
Church angry, gays happy
PNP on collision course with Christians
THE perennially controversial issue of homosexuality appears to have set the Opposition People’s National Party (PNP) on collision course with some sections of the Christian Church.
PNP Leader Portia Simpson Miller shocked the television audience watching her debate with Prime Minister Andrew Holness Tuesday night, with her suggestion that the buggery law should be reviewed and that she was not opposed to having gays in a Cabinet led by her.
MILLER… it is saying that moral values become secondary to ability to perform
 1/4 

“That is very concerning for me [reviewing the buggery law] and I am disappointed that we are still insisting to go back in that direction, because the matter was dealt with in the amended Bill of Rights earlier this year,” said Rev Al Miller, pastor of the Fellowship Tabernacle in Kingston.
Miller said he was equally disappointed with the Opposition Leader’s stance that she had no problem admitting anyone to her Cabinet once they were qualified to carry out their duties.
“I am seriously concerned about that, because it is saying that moral values becomes secondary to ability to perform,” the pastor said, adding: “That kind of approach would be difficult for Christians to support because character and integrity takes precedence over ability.”
Associate pastor of the Tower Hill Missionary Church, Rev Mark Dawes also took offence at Simpson Miller’s stance: “If we remove the buggery law, then we might be opening the floodgate for sexual anarchy,” he cautioned.
He said, however, that he understood her belief that no one should be prevented from being apart of a Cabinet once they were qualified to do so, even if they subscribed to the gay lifestyle.
“If the person is not promoting that lifestyle, then I could grow to be comfortable with them in the Cabinet, but if it is somebody who is championing the lifestyle and advocating for it, then I’ll have a problem,” Dawes said.
In the debate, Simpson Miller said: “We should have a look at the buggery law,” distancing herself from Former Prime Minister Bruce Golding who told a British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) interviewer he would not allow a homosexual in his Cabinet.
The Seventh-day Adventists also rejected the call to revisit the buggery law, while saying they had no problem with gays in a Cabinet.
“The issue is with reviewing the law, that’s where the church has an issue. Like any other faith-based organisation, we are concerned because it goes against the biblical side of things,” said SDA director of communication, public affairs and religious liberty, Nigel Coke.
But general secretary of the Jamaica Baptist Union, Rev Karl Johnson commended Simpson Miller for tackling the issue head on when asked by a journalist in the debate. Reviewing the law did not necessarily mean that a change would occur, Johnson argued.
“I think it is a commendable thing to always review our laws to see whether they speak to current realities, whether they are still informed by values and norms that we can sustain both as a country and I would say as a religious community,” he said.
President of the Jamaica Association of Full Gospel Churches, Bishop Rohan Edwards said he believed that a review of the buggery act would not affect the way the church viewed the homosexual lifestyle.
“We don't have a problem with the revisiting buggery law, but we know the law that we have to answer to which is the word of God. So they have the right to revisit anything they want to,” he said.
For its part, the Jamaica Forum for Lesbians, All-Sexuals and Gays (JFLAG) welcomed Simpson Miller’s position. Executive director of the lobby group, Dane Lewis, said: “We are very encouraged by the statement, it was a very bold statement by a political leader knowing the history of statements which our leaders have made and so we look forward to seeing what is to come if they certainly do form the next government.
“It really speaks loudly to a respect for the human rights of all Jamaicans, including those who are gay, lesbian, bi-sexual or transgender,” he noted.
He said he was disappointed with the response given by Holness who was very cautious in his response when he stated that his “sentiment must be the sentiment of the country”.
“We are disappointed that the prime minister, even though he had another opportunity to make certainly a bold statement, he didn’t,” he said. “It is very clear that he is going to pander to the religious community and vaguely step around the issue,” Lewis asserted.

Adventists say no problem with buggery law review, but Comments [Pictures]


Idiot plan that-Many Jamaicans Buggery Law Review Comments [Pictures]













Jamaica's Reaction to Statement By Portia Simpson Miller Part VII

So the Adventists are saying that it's ok to review the bugger law, but there will be a problem if it is repealed? 
I wonder what is their understanding of review the law?
The following was taken from the Jamaica Observer
Adventists say no problem with buggery law review, but...
Director of communication, public affairs and religious liberty for the Jamaica Union Conference of Seventh-day Adventists, Nigel Coke, has clarified a statement made in yesterday's edition of the Observer that the church rejected the promise made by Opposition Leader and People's National Party President Portia Simpson Miller to review the buggery law should her party come to power.
He said the church does not have a problem with a review of the buggery law, since it does not mean there will be a change to the legislation. However, he said the church would voice its concerns if the law is repealed or changed.


Read more: http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/Adventists-say-no-problem-with-buggery-law-review--but---_10447231#ixzz1hPRp70DI

Jamaica's Reaction to Statement By Portia Simpson Miller Part VI

The following was posted in the Jamaica Observer.

Where was the church all along?
Dear Editor,
This is an open letter to all the organised groups of churches in Jamaica.
My name is Jevon Minto. I am currently in my second year at Northern Caribbean University, pursuing a Bachelor of Arts Degree in religion and theology.
Jamaica is one of those countries where the church still influences the decisions of the State. And while this opportunity exists, no other group of people is more unconcerned about social life than the church. Every other group is speaking out, except the church. I think you all deserve a beating from God for rejecting the prophetic ministry that He has called you to, especially where it concerns politics.
If secularism takes over Jamaica you all should be blamed! If Opposition Leader Portia Simpson Miller did not propose to review the buggery law — if she is re-elected — would Jamaica hear anything from you [the church] at this time?
Imagine, three national political debates and not one of the panellists represented the church. Not one question was asked regarding the church. Why speak now and talk ill of the proposition made by the Opposition?
I am definitely not in support of homosexuality, but if the church did not assume such a passive role in the affairs of the nation, then we would not have a leader even thinking about making such a proposal in public.
It leads me to question your integrity. Are you Christian, or are you Christian excused? Did Jesus, our Lord and Saviour, behave in such a passive manner where the issues of the nation were concerned? Was He hypocritical, or was He a self-aggrandiser?
Did He not care for the entire man instead of just the Spiritual man? Until you care more about Jamaica rather than the church, reserve your comments. They only make people laugh at you and make God disappointed in you!
Jevon Minto
jminto10@stu.nuc.edu.jm


Read more: http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/letters/Where-was-the-church-all-along_10447129#ixzz1hOTQslUG

Jamaica's Reaction to Statement By Portia Simpson Miller Part V

Apparently the rights to freedom of expression, thought and conscience must not be tolerated. The following was posted by Wayne West of the Isaachar Foundation in the Jamaica Observer. 
Why a conscience vote on sodomy, Mrs Simpson Miller?
Dear Editor,
Baggaley et al of the Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, MRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Paddington, London, UK, reporting in the International Journal of Epidemiology of August 2010 in the article: "HIV transmission risk through anal intercourse: systematic review, meta-analysis and implications for HIV prevention", stated that among both heterosexuals and homosexuals, "Unprotected anal intercourse is a high-risk practice for HIV transmission".
Also, local media reported that the Jamaican Government found it necessary to set aside a total of some J$594 million for HIV prevention during the 2009 to 2010 and 2010 to 2011 fiscal years.
In light of this data, why would Mrs Simpson Miller consider bringing the decriminalisation of sodomy to a conscience vote ?
Wayne West
Kgn 6
wayne_west@hotmail.com


Read more: http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/letters/Why-a-conscience-vote-on-sodomy--Mrs-Simpson-Miller-_10446103#ixzz1hORvg700 

Jamaica's Reaction to Statement By Portia Simpson Miller Part II

I've been trying to decide how to keep my readers up to speed with what is happening following Portia Simpson Miller's [personal] statement that gays can serve in her cabinet (read it here: Simpson Miller Gays can serve in my cabinet (Jamaica Election Debates 2011- Leadership ). I've decided that until I sit and put my thoughts together I'll keep you updated by reposting news articles, other blogs, videos, and comments (Jamaica's Reaction to Statement By Portia Simpson Miller (Gays can serve in my cabinet) Pt I).

So let's get started.

The following was taken from the Jamaica Observer.


‘Idiot plan that!’ - Many Jamaicans against Buggery Law Review
THE pronouncement by Opposition Leader and People’s National Party (PNP) President Portia Simpson Miller during Tuesday night’s national leadership debate that a PNP government led by her would review the buggery law has set off a heated debate with many Jamaicans as well as some churches voicing strong opposition to any such move.
Observer staff reporter Kimmo Matthews yesterday sought the opinions of members of the public on Simpson Miller’s position.
(L-R) ‘Rastaman’, Judith Brown White and Chevan Brown
 1/3 

‘Rastaman’
It is something that I would have to go think about, as I do not want to jump to any conclusion on what was said.
Judith Brown White: Supermarket Sales Rep
I have a problem with that decision. To carry out such a review is totally wrong. What it is promoting is totally against the teachings of the Bible.
Chevan Brown
I think it was a ploy to get votes.
Delroy Mitchell
It has been happening, not here in Jamaica only, and soon or later we are going to have to take a stance. I believe that the rights of citizens should be recognised.
Devon Campbell: Taxi Operator
Not in my cabinet! If a man a deal with him thing, mek him deal with it one side. So that means sooner or later, with this review of the law, my grandchildren can’t walk in peace.
Hubert Palmer: Security guard
We are to stop trying to put a pretty coating on the issue. That sort of practice should not be tolerated. What sort of message will that send to my little son down the road?
Chairmaine Mundle: Supermarket Sales Rep
That should never be allowed to happen. God has never created people to operate and entertain that sort of practice. Our country has a strong Christian faith and belief and that sort of practice should not be encouraged and that is what such a planned review will do.
‘Businesswoman’
Our source is God. Why are we trying to sell our souls for the almighty dollar? Jamaica is not a country that embraces that sort of practice. She is out of her cotton-picking mind and she should not sell her soul for the dollar.
Ian
It is full time we should try to move away from that sort of primitive approach and allow people to live their lives despite of their sexual orientation.
Richardo Wedderburn: Security Guard
She should have tried to come up with some different approach. I know because she is a woman she a go try balance the thing. But I believe a revision of such laws is going to affect us down the road.
Jonelle Jefferson: Secretary
I do not care what a man or woman wants to do with their life, but the Opposition needs to realise that it is Jamaica we are living in and we are not going to change our views and I think it is going to hurt her chances in the upcoming election.
Orlando Gayle: Security Guard
That is totally unacceptable. Such practice and support of such practice cannot be right at all. We burn that sort of practice. Her move or plans to review the law will certainly help to promote such practice.
Toney Bromwell: Taxi Operator
Idiot plan that. Jamaica no deal with that. A vote me feel she a look.


Read more: http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/Many-Jamaicans-against-Buggery-Law-review_10447168#ixzz1hNcbo3dI

Thursday, December 8, 2011

Developments in LGBT Human Rights

I'm sure we all know what's happening in the 'Western' world as it relates to the most recent development in LGBT human rights.

The Obama administration announced on Tuesday that the United States would use all the tools of American diplomacy, including the potent enticement of foreign aid, to promote gay rights around the world. In a memorandum issued by President Obama in Washington and in a speech by Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton here, the administration vowed to actively combat efforts by other nations that criminalize homosexual conduct, abuse gay men, lesbians, bisexuals or transgendered people, or ignore abuse against them.

“Some have suggested that gay rights and human rights are separate and distinct,” Mrs. Clinton said at the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva, “but in fact they are one and the same.”

Neither Mr. Obama nor Mrs. Clinton specified how to give the initiative teeth. Caitlin Hayden, the National Security Council’s deputy spokeswoman, said the administration was “not cutting or tying” foreign aid to changes in other nation’s practices.

Of course with this development we knew the religious right would not remain quiet, after all, Secretary Hillary Clinton’s speech on defending LGBT rights abroad and the new Obama administration policy to protect people around the world who are jailed, beaten and executed for being LGBT have been met with intense uproar from the Religious Right.

Pat Robertson on The 700 Club today said that the policy was “appalling” shows that America is willing to “violate God’s principles and to make a mockery of His laws.” Robertson even warned that God will not tolerate it and “when the blow comes, it’s going to be horrible”:


Fellow blogger H of GLBTQ Jamaica Watch posted:

"NTV is owned by the same company that publishes Daily Monitor, Uganda’s largest independent newspaper. This news report was posted to their YouTube channel just moments ago:

The report itself is very calm and measured. But it does reflect prevailing opinion not only in Uganda but through much of Africa when the reporter asks at the end, “Will Uganda blink and bow to the pressure?” The image of bowing, as you can imagine given Africa’s history, has a very specific humiliative resonance that goes much deeper than much of the rest of the world. The three lawmakers in the report — Anti-Homosexuality Bill author M.P. David Bahati, M.P. Steven Ochola of the opposition Forum for Democratic Change (FDP), and Ethics and Integrity Minister Simon Lokodo (Lokodo is identified as “Rev. Fr.,” despite having been defrocked by the Vatican) — all spoke against Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s remarks in Geneva. Human rights lawyer Ladislaus Rwakafuzi suggests that a sort of “don’t ask, don’t tell” compromise might be the best way to go for Uganda’s LGBT community."


The responses on the Ugandan TV channel show some of the views of the people:

Great - if demeaning the humanity of its gay citizens is more imporant to the people of Uganda than receiving foreign aid than so be it. Cut them off.



A Jamaica Observer's news article titled: Gay pressure - US to limit aid drew some of the following comments:

Wayne Henry
12/8/2011
Obama just lost my vote. I voted, donated and campaigned for Obama in the last election and now I regret that. As a devoted democrat this will be the first time that I will vote Republican. You can't black mail Jamaica and other soverign countries. You can't give aid with strings attached. Jamaica must stand strong and don't bow to Sodom and Gomorrah. Homosexuality is unnatural and is a sin against God. I love Michele Bachman views on gays. I will never ever give in to gay lifestyle.

Read more: http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/Gay-pressure_10338535#ixzz1fy695woL

Jacqueline Crawford
12/8/2011
Let them keep their aid. Why should they dictate what another country does, especially when colour prejudice is alive and well in the USA. If they countries didn't have the so called aid every other country would be better off eg Cuba b/c they would all learn how to become self reliant. Obama is the most ungodly US president.

Read more: http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/Gay-pressure_10338535#ixzz1fy6dpIUZ

steve ellis
12/8/2011
Matthew Thomas is an idiot. Sorry to say. Impose in your bedroom? What we are talking about is something immoral and wrong, whether you do it in your bedroom or in public. No government should be forced to do as another country says because of aid. They should not dictate to us what we do. Our law is our law. I hope the government do not "bow" to this type of pressure..ever!!!

Read more: http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/Gay-pressure_10338535#ixzz1fy6nt8EA

N. Byrd
12/8/2011
This is a clear attempt to have everyone everywhere bow to the will of the minority. No country has the right tell the Jamaican people what should be morally acceptable to them. I've notice that when Obama took office Jamaicans talked of him being a king for them, well how fundamentally foolish you all must feel. Jamaica got independence in 1962 yet people having vegetable matter for brains would give it up to a man who doesn't believe in the will of the Jamaican People. Lord Have Mercy.

Read more: http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/Gay-pressure_10338535#ixzz1fy79CeiG

Let us see what will happen. Already the Lawyers Christian Fellowship Jamaica is having a symposium: 

“Human Rights, Sovereignty and the Politics of Truth”

Saturday December 10, 2011 at Lecture Room 2, Faculty of Law, Mona, UWI

I can only imagine what the discussions will be like, after all Mrs. Shirley Richards, Attorney-at-Laws, The Honourable Mr. Delroy Chuck, MP, Rev. Dr. Clinton Chisholm, Dr. Wayne West will be there. 

I'm looking forward to hearing about this event. I will not be present but I'm asking any one who attends to send me an email and let me know about the proceedings.

The bell has been sounded and now the battle has begun. H said it's time to wake up and I agree. It's time to wake up, no more sleeping. 

Monday, November 21, 2011

Slippery Slope

The following was written by Angeline Jackson, regarding what is the conservative Christians are doing to Jamaica, or at least what they are trying to do. Have fun.

***************************************************************************

As the Christian Right freely goes out and legislates morality, and what women, can and cannot do with their bodies, let us not forget, that we the enablers, are but pawns in their game, easily disposable; for as we agree with, inter alia the prohibition of abortion, the illegality of buggery, and the banning of marijuana, let us be aware of the slippery slope we trod.

If the Christian Right gets its way and performs the irreligious marriage of Church and State, they will impose upon a secular, multi-religious nation, laws and sanctions that suit their ideology. Let us not delve into which brand of Right Wing Christianity we will have to adopt for that is anyone’s guess. Let us instead look at what we take for granted and how our lives will be affected by such a marriage.

The rights of women

  • The rape of a woman is but a minor transgression (Genesis 19:8 and Judges 19:16-30). We can already see this in how our current law defines rape, by refusing to any forced sexual activity against a woman. Indeed Part II of the Sexual Offences Act 2009, does not recognise penetration of the vagina or anus by a body part other than the penis, an object manipulated by the offender, or the placing of the penis into the mouth of the victim as rape, rather it is defined as grievous sexual assault (thank the Lawyers Christian Fellowship in helping to make this definition)
  • Women are the property of their father and at marriage her ownership is transferred to her new husband (Exodus 20 & 21)
  • Women ought not to be ministers of religion(Ephesians 1:22,23, 1 Timothy 3:1-2, 1 Timothy 2:11-14). Should we interpret this into professions generally? After all women were considered to only be homemakers and housekeepers.


Common law marriage


The laws recognising common law relationships will have to be discarded, as common-law marriage falls short of honouring Christ. As such the rights of surviving partners of the relationship will not be recognised. You better get married people!

Gambling


The laws allowing gambling will have to be abolished. Casinos, gaming houses, horse racing, bingos and raffles must become outlawed and prohibited (1 Timothy 6:10, Hebrews 13:5, Matthew 6:24, Proverbs 28:22,).

Meals


Depending on which brand of Christianity we become ruled by, our meals will also be regulated. There will be no:

  • Pork and Christmas ham (Leviticus 11:7-8 , Deuteronomy 14:8)
  • Shellfish (Leviticus 11:10, Deuteronomy 14:9-10, Leviticus 11:9-12)
  • Cheese Patties (the mixing of meat and dairy)


Work on Saturday and Sunday


Depending on whose brand of Christianity we become ruled by, we will have to prohibit working on Friday night, Saturday, and Sunday.

Alcohol


The drinking of alcoholic beverages will have to be prohibited. Indeed we may have to impose something very similar to the ‘Prohibition in the United States’ which was a national ban on the sale, manufacture, and transportation of alcohol, in place from 1920 to 1933. Why would the Christians want to ban the sale of alcohol?

  • It distorts the perception of reality (Is 28:7; Prov 23:33)
  • It impairs the capacity to make responsible decisions (Lev 10:9-11)
  • It weakens moral sensitivities and inhibitions (Gen 9:21; 19:32; Hab 2:15; Is 5:11-12)
  • It causes physical sickness (Prov 23:20-21; Hos 7:5; Is 19:14; Ps 60:3)


Look out Red Stripe, J. Wray and Nephew, Tia Maria, Desnoes and Geddes, Lascelles Wines and Spirits, Edwin Charlie, Sangster’s, wholesalers, retailers, bars, hotels, and restaurants. The sale of alcohol will soon be prohibited.

Cigarettes


We will also have to ban cigarette smoking (1 Corinthians 6:19-20, 1 Corinthians 6:12). Cigarette Company Of Jamaica Limited, Carreras, sellers, and distributers of cigarettes and tobacco products be aware, you will be suffering the same fate.

Religious freedom


Of course with a Church state we can’t possibly have freedom of religion. So Rastafarianism, Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam, Roman Catholicism, Particular denominations of Christianity, Mormons, Bahá'í Faith practitioners, Spirutualists, Judaism, Revivalism (and others) will have to go underground.

Social life (parties)


Our social events will be regulated, no more ATI, RTI, clubbing, places like Palais Royale Nightclub, Shades Nightclub, Ceasar’s Nightclub, Mass Camp and Carnival, Reggae Sumfest, Margaritaville, Mobay Proper, Coral Cliff will have to close down. Then we will have to move on to places like Hedonism, and Couples and many of our other resorts catering to adult entertainment, you will also have to look out, you are all on the chopping block.

Education


Classroom education will also be regulated. Sex education (what little there is) will possibly become non-existent or at the very most, taught solely along Christian ideology. And how will we treat religious education? Shall we teach only Christianity or will we offer Christian views of other religious teaching from Christian authors? And what of science? How will science be taught? Will Darwin be thrown out? Your guess is as good as mine.

Sex life


With regard to adultery both the man and the woman caught, must be put to death (Deuteronomy 22:22, Leviticus 20:10).

Regarding divorce (with 2,371 divorces this should be interesting), the laws permitting divorce will have to be removed, (Malachi 2:14-16, Matthew 19:4-6). Remember too that the Bible says that anyone who divorces and remarries commits adultery (Mark 10:12, Matthew 19:9, Mark 10:11, Luke 16:18), I guess that means that all divorced and remarried persons having committed adultery should also be put to death?

Fornication is met with death as in Deuteronomy 22:13-21, which says that a woman who is not a virgin upon her marriage must be stoned to death.

Finally we would have to force rape victims to marry their rapist as per Deuteronomy 22:28-29.

No I’m not mad


By espousing these views I’m not going mad, this is happening right now in our world; in fact this is the same fight going on in the United States right now! While writing this piece I came across an article on The Christian Left blog, talking about Reconstructionism and Dominionism.

Christian Reconstructionism is a religious and theological movement within Evangelical Christianity that calls for Christians to put their faith into action in all areas of life, within the private sphere of life and the public and political sphere as well. The social structure advocated by Christian Reconstructionism would have the clergy, laity and government, individually and corporately, to be in ultimate submission to the moral principles of the Bible, including the Old Testament, while retaining their separate jurisdictional spheres of authority and roles in society as inferred from principles of Biblical law, both Old and New Testaments.

Dominionism is a term used to describe politically active conservative Christians that are believed to conspire and seek influence or control over secular civil government through political action, especially in the United States, with the goal of either a nation governed by Christians, or a nation governed by a conservative Christian understanding of Biblical law. Dominion Theology is a grouping of theological systems with the common belief that the law of God, as codified in the Bible, should exclusively govern society, to the exclusion of secular law, a view also known as theonomy. The most prominent modern formulation of Dominion Theology is Christian Reconstructionism, founded by R. J. Rushdoony in the 1970s. Reconstructionists themselves use the word dominionism to refer to their belief that Christians alone should control civil government, conducting it according to Biblical law.

Am I saying Christianity has no place what so ever in Jamaican society? Am I saying people must be able to do whatever they want regardless of the effect it may have on others? No, and no. I am saying however, that the tyranny of the mighty should not be imposed on others. I am saying everyone should be free to exercise their rights so long as it does not infringe upon the rights of others. I am saying we must be respectful. There is no respect in the Church wanting to force legislation to suit their ideology.

We must reject our roles as pawns and refuse to be intimidated by the Churches power; we must build a Jamaica for all persons, respecting rights, allowing persons to make their own choices.

There is a poem I want to leave you with, the words are chilling, but they are not farfetched. It was written by Friedrich Gustav Emil Martin Niemöller, who was a German anti-Nazi theologian, Protestant pastor and social activist; it says:


In Germany, they came first for the Communists,
And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Communist;
And then they came for the trade unionists,
And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a trade unionist;
And then they came for the Jews,
And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Jew;
And then . . . they came for me . . .
And by that time there was no one left to speak up.




Angeline Jackson
A Christian Tired of Being Misrepresented

****************************************************************************

I'm really not sure what else I should add. As far-fetched as her arguments may seem, they really aren't that far off at all. Look at what the church and groups like the Lawyers Christian Fellowship have been able to do. Look at how they have exerted their power and created a constitution deliberately leaving out many. Look at how they attempt to control others by creating fear, fellow blogger H over at his blog (Gay Jamaica Watch) tells us about a radio interview of a Dr. Wayne West:

who declared that Christian lawyers and people of God will not stand by and allow homosexuality to be legalized. He said among others things significant lawyers from Europe are a part of the moves to impose sodomy on Jamaica and that we (the church I would imagine) must resist it. He mentioned the high rates of HIV in the Men who have sex with men community and quoted figures from France and other areas suggesting HIV/AIDS is a gay disease as other religious spokespersons have done instilling a fear that repealing the laws will unleash more infections. In referring to the legal challenge against the buggery laws in Belize that is ongoing he also said "....yes Jamaica is the next place ..... there can be only one, if certain rights dominate in the public sphere the church will be into the closet." (read the rest here)

Are we going to wait until they have gotten rid of those in society we don't like and then turn on us for us to fight against them? Actually I'd be dead by then for I'm one of those ills they want gone. 

As Ms. Jackson said, let's stop being pawns, let's stand up to this tyranny before it is too late.

By the way I wonder if the papers will publish her?
What needs do the community have that have been left unattended or barely attended to?
Directory of doctors and medical personnel
Support for young LGBTIs
Homelessness
Other
  
pollcode.com free polls